Koei Tecmo Wiki:Votes for Featured Articles

Here's where you can nominate and vote on articles to be featured on the front page.
 * To nominate, simply write your nomination under the Nominees section and sign your posts. A nomination is equal to a vote, and it's one nomination per person.
 * To vote, simply sign with # ~ under the nominees to symbolize your support. You can vote for as much as two nominees at a time. You can always change it at anytime, until the selection date.
 * Once a nominee is selected, we'll clear the nominees section to start a clear slate. You can nominate the same article again one month later. We call it a transition period.
 * You can give your Comments in the section below, but any claims of supporting a nominee does not count until you sign under the Nominees section. Take care!

Nominees

 * Kojiro Sasaki
 * 1) Moogle Buddy 19:34, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * We really need to change the article, it gets stale after a month extra. The Kojiro page is well written and I feel complete, so I nominate it. I would also think it fun in a month or two to nominate the SW3 page as it's an upcoming game and would bring attention to the wikia.Moogle Buddy 19:34, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't feel like the article's quality is up to par as it is still incomplete. Better candidates for complete character articles would actually be Taigong Wang, Sun Wukong, Gracia and Guan Ping. It just feels like you're nominating this article due to fan bias rather than the article's actual completeness, merits and content. Kyosei 20:10, October 1, 2009 (UTC)


 * I just want it changed myself. That and nominating an article is suppose to be a fun thing, of course bias will be there. As long as it's an article up to par, what's the problem with that? An article shows the best of the wikia, and there are many articles of that calibur. Kojiro has complete analysis, a moveset overview, pictures, a quote section+link to bigger page, I call it complete. It can be improved(and I will get to work on that, I'm back for a bit at least{I also worked the Kunoichi page from nothing to featured so I have the abilitiy}), but so can every single article. If there are better articles let them be nominated, but I've cast my vote. I'm simply doing this to encourage others to do so. It's been two months, and no one's cast a vote, so I'm trying to get them to start. Voting an article is a moment of pride and fun on the wikia, you show the article you feel confidence in, should an article outvote mine, then great! It's obviously a favorite among the wikia, and therefore the most worked on. So in a polite way I encourage everyone to shut up and vote on there article, and improve it as much as possible! Ah, I rememeber the few glory months of everyone doing that...then they disappeared.Moogle Buddy 00:15, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a rather contradictory statement: the featured article should represent the best the wiki has to offer but at the same time you admit that Kojiro's article could use some improvements. Thus by your own admission is not the best the wiki could offer. Secondly, it's only been a month and a half haha.


 * In any case, I'd rather something non-Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors and Warriors Orochi related be nominated. It was fine when that used to be this wiki's focus but it has since expanded to include other Koei games and franchises. It's more stale in my opinion to keep promoting the same franchises when obviously other ones have been included. Any of the Kessen games, Fengshen Yanyi, Gundam, Saihai no Yukue or the first Dynasty Tactics game article are good candidates.


 * Then vote, that's all I want. My vote really is just a suggestion, so long as everyone else votes I really don't care. It looks rigid if we keep the same article up month after month, and so I cast a vote to see if I can change it. I also agree about using other franchises, got any suggestions? Nominate them if that's the case and I may give my secondary vote to it. In all honesty if everyone does that I could care less who is nominated so long as they show off our Wikia. And try to be more admin like, it's not very well to not sign your name, laugh, and offer nothing but critism.Moogle Buddy 02:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * The not signing part was my mistake, tends to happen when I do more than one thing at once and forget. I'm human after all ;p So what would you suggest for me to be more admin-like? I'm only offering constructive criticism as it is. I'd rather not influence the featured articles as I am admin and not a regular user anymore. I don't want to add my own bias into this sort of matter and have already offered more than one suggestion. I'd rather the regular editors/users to decide rather than me as I feel an admin's role is more or less to be a moderator and offer advice when needed. Kyosei 03:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to apologize in advance if you thought the sentence: Secondly, it's only been a month and a half haha. was patronizing and condescending. I'd actually meant that to be sarcastic and lighthearted but often forget that sarcasm does not translate as well to text. Kyosei 04:22, October 3, 2009 (UTC)